Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, having a general score of 88.5 against 78.4. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Galaxy Z Flip's design has the same thickness than the Galaxy C7 Pro, but it is a little heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a larger display, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a superior camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a much higher video definition. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a battery life that is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.