Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Galaxy M51, having a global score of 88.5 against 87.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Galaxy M51 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy M51, even though both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little bit higher display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.