Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, getting an 88.5 score against 79.3. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Galaxy Z Flip is a a lot newer and a little bit thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, although it's just a little heavier.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a just a little higher pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip features a better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 7 more CPU cores.
Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy Note 5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy Note 5. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy Note 5, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.