Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip design weights the same than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it is just a little bit thicker. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version, so it offers some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip one, both of them have a higher pixels quantity per display inch, an equal 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a same size display. Galaxy Z Flip features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a battery performance that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's battery lifetime. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have a 12 MP camera and a F1.8 aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs more money than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Z Flip 3. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.