Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.18 x 2.72 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xperia 10 II's 78.5 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Xperia 10 II has Android 10, providing some extra features. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Xperia 10 II were only released with a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is thinner but heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better processing power than Xperia 10 II, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. Sony Xperia 10 II counts with a display that is very similar to the display in Galaxy Z Flip, because although the Sony Xperia 10 II has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2520px, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
The Xperia 10 II counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Xperia 10 II features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia 10 II, and although they both have the same video quality and a same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger sensor capturing higher quality photos, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.