Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia PRO is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip, with a score of 94.3 against 88.5. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia PRO has an older 10 version and Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version. The Xperia PRO design is newer than Galaxy Z Flip's, but it is extremely thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better hardware performance than Xperia PRO. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Xperia PRO counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display density and a much better resolution of 1644 x 3840 pixels.
The Xperia PRO has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same video definition and a 12 mega pixels camera, the Xperia PRO also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
The Xperia PRO features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 512 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Xperia PRO has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Xperia PRO is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Xperia PRO, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.