Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a overall score of 88.5 against 82.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a newer phone, and it's also a lot thinner and extremely lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better display density and a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster CPU than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3540mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip costs more money than Xperia XZ2 Premium, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.