Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Even though Galaxy Z Flip is older than vivo X70 Pro, it's body is a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, providing a lot of extra features.
The vivo X70 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a little bigger screen and a just a bit higher pixels quantity per screen inch.
Vivo X70 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a much bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
The vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy Z Flip count with similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have the same 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.