Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 4's global score of 88.3. Although Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, it's body is lighter and much thinner. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has Android 11 version, so it offers some additional features and enhanced performance.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite worse display pixels density, they both have a screen of the same size. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Z Flip. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same size aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a lot larger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Black Shark 4. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.