Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's global score of 82.7. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user some extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is thinner and just a bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, even when both were released with only 6 months difference.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a just a bit lower pixel quantity per inch in the display and a bit smaller display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.