Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's general score of 77.5. Galaxy Z Flip is a extremely newer device, and it's also lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a little bit greater pixels count in each inch of display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Galaxy Z Flip takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger camera aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi Max 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Max 2, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.