Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Ceramic |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's overall score of 79.8. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features and a performance increase. Galaxy Z Flip's design is a little thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it was released around 14 months before.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a very superior processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a better 1860 x 2480 resolution and a larger display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has a back-facing camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features as much storage for apps and games as the Galaxy Z Flip one, both of them have equal internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.