Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with a score of 88.5 against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is newer and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's, but it is just a little heavier. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, a little smaller screen and a bit less pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a lot higher video resolution and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.