Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than the iPhone X, with a overall score of 94.6 against 88.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is extremely newer and a bit thinner, but also heavier than the iPhone X. IPhone X has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1125 x 2436px, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
The Apple iPhone X features a bit better processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots clearer videos and photos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 camera aperture and a 12 mega pixels resolution camera, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a much larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
IPhone X counts with as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, they have equal internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 66% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Apple iPhone X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Apple iPhone X. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Apple iPhone X, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.