Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than iPhone XS's 84.2 overall score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is newer and a little bit thinner, but also noticeably heavier than iPhone XS. The iPhone XS has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower 1125 x 2436px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen pixel density.
The iPhone XS features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 12 mega-pixels camera in the back, the same video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 69% greater battery size.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way more expensive than the Apple iPhone XS, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.