Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is incredibly heavier than HTC U Ultra, it's somewhat thinner and a lot newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density. The HTC U Ultra counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels camera, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a really longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot more expensive than HTC U Ultra, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.