Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a general score of 94.6 against 81.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's a bit thinner and much newer. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processing unit than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with greater battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way less MP resolution camera in the back, a smaller diafragm aperture and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.