Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is better than Moto G60's overall score of 79.5. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is notably heavier but noticeably thinner than Moto G60, and both of them were only released 7 months apart. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better looking display than Moto G60, because although it has a bit inferior pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Moto G60 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G60 also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Moto G60 counts with better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.