Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-09-30 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Nokia 7.2, with a general score of 94.6 against 75.9. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is newer and somewhat thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Nokia 7.2.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better performance than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nokia 7.2 has a display that's very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although the Nokia 7.2 has a bit smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better camera than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Nokia 7.2 counts with just a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has greater battery duration than Nokia 7.2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.