Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Galaxy A22, with a 94.6 score against 76.1. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and way heavier than the Galaxy A22, it's design is still thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A22, because it has a bigger screen, more pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A22.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.