Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), with a 94.6 score against 75.8. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than Galaxy A7 (2017), it's thinner and much newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a lot worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.