Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a score of 94.6 against 76.9. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A70, although it's extremely heavier.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor and faster video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Galaxy A70 both count with similar batteries.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A70, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.