Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a 94.6 score against 79. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a extremely newer and thinner device than Xperia XZ2 Compact, but it is way heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with more memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2870mAh.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a way worse image quality and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.