Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Xiaomi 14T Pro, getting a 94.6 score against 84.5. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way older and incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, it's construction is still thinner. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi 14T Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a much sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little worse 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better hardware performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro. Both have a 12 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a larger camera aperture, a much higher resolution camera in the back, a lot higher video definition and a much larger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with as much storage for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, they have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.