Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, having a global score of 94.6 against 82.9. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is newer and extremely thinner, but also incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.