Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi A3's 79.2 score. Both devices in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is newer and thinner, but also a lot heavier than Xiaomi Mi A3. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a way better 1768 x 2208 resolution, a bigger screen and a higher pixel density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and lower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.