Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | -- |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, getting a score of 94.6 against 86.1. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is somewhat thinner but incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a higher pixel quantity per inch of screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a much more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.