Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's 75.7 general score. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is notably older and much heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, it's construction is still thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher number of pixels in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.