Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Google Pixel 3a, having a overall score of 90.6 against 78.8. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a noticeably newer and a lot thinner phone than the Google Pixel 3a, although it's also way heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3a counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixel density.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3a has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture and a more MP camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 47% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.