Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 5, with a 90.6 score against 89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is newer and thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Google Pixel 5. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels count in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 5 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.