Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 overall score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is newer and thinner than LG G7 ThinQ's, although it is much heavier.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a way greater pixels density. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster processor than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG G7 ThinQ captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with a way better 16 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations. The LG G7 ThinQ has a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 47% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.