Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 score. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is newer and noticeably thinner than LG G8X ThinQ's, but it's notably heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a newer 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better processing power than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger aperture for better low light captures and video. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit longer battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.