Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is just a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a general score of 90.6 against 82.5. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is way newer and somewhat thinner than the LG V30S ThinQ's, although it is also a lot heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a greater screen pixels density. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little faster processor than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a way more megapixels camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.