Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is much better than LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is notably newer and thinner, but noticeably heavier than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.