Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than LG V40 ThinQ, with a 90.6 score against 81.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a notably newer and thinner phone than the LG V40 ThinQ, but it's also heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a much larger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features greater battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.