Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than LG Velvet, having a global score of 90.6 against 87.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and thinner phone than the LG Velvet, but it is heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet features a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. The LG Velvet captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.