Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola edge's 89.6 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version while Motorola edge has Android 10 version. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is extremely heavier than Motorola edge, it's a lot thinner and newer.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola edge, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola edge count with similar displays, because although the Motorola edge has a way worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Motorola edge has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola edge also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola edge features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola edge captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.