Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a score of 90.6 against 78.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is somewhat thinner than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it is heavier and was released around 13 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture and a back facing camera with a way better resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 feature quite similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.