Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a 90.6 score against 80.9. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is way thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it is much heavier and was released only 13 months before.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a brighter display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.