Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a score of 90.6 against 86.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is noticeably older and much heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's design is still much thinner. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.