Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a global score of 90.6 against 87.1. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is older and noticeably heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is still incredibly thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both of them have 12 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way larger camera aperture for better low light captures and a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.