Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Moto G 5G, with a 90.6 score against 81.5. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Moto G 5G were released only a few months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is notably heavier but a lot thinner.
The Motorola Moto G 5G and Galaxy Z Fold 3 both feature similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto G 5G has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better processing power than Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with way more mega pixels. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit more storage to install applications and games than Moto G 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.