Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, having a general score of 90.6 against 82.6. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is newer and much thinner, but also way heavier than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2520px, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations and a way more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Moto G 5G Plus has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.