Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Moto G Power, having a 90.6 score against 76.1. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and way thinner than the Moto G Power's, although it is also a lot heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a screen that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 one, because although the Motorola Moto G Power has a way worse 1080 x 2300px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Moto G Power has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much larger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations. Moto G Power features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.