Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is better than the Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 global score. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is noticeably heavier but incredibly thinner than Moto G Stylus (2021), and both were only released with a couple months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Moto G Stylus (2021) has a screen that is very similar to the display in Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although the Moto G Stylus (2021) has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. Moto G Stylus (2021) features a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger camera aperture for better low light images and video.
Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little better battery duration than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.