Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than Moto G100, having a 90.6 score against 88.9. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is incredibly thinner but a lot heavier than Moto G100, and both of them were released with only a few months difference. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS. The Moto G100 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto G100 features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better count of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Moto G100 counts with more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G100 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. The Moto G100 features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.