Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | -- |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is better than the Moto G60s's 79.9 global score. These devices use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a notably thinner but way heavier phone than Moto G60s. The Moto G60s and Galaxy Z Fold 3 both count with extremely similar displays, because although the Moto G60s has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density.
The Moto G60s counts with a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit superior CPU than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
Moto G60s captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments and a camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution. Motorola Moto G60s has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.