Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Moto Z Force, having a 90.6 score against 75.8. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is incredibly heavier than Moto Z Force, it's thinner and extremely newer.
Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density. Moto Z Force features a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster). The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 26% more battery size. The Motorola Moto Z Force captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.