Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's overall score of 77.4. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's notably heavier and a little bit thicker. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a better pixel density. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution camera, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.