Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Moto Z2 Play, with a 90.6 score against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is incredibly newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, although it's extremely heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's display, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a much smaller display and a lot worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a greater memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.